Final Verdict
0/100
An architecture studio that has managed the impossible: building a website so structurally unsound that even Google's crawlers refuse to enter the building.
Impression
10
Using an 'altervista.org' subdomain for an architecture studio is like trying to sell luxury penthouses out of a cardboard box under a bridge. It doesn't say 'minimalist design'; it says 'I couldn't find 12 euros for a real domain name.'
Free-tier poverty aesthetic
Performance
15
The site is so poorly configured that standard modern browsers throw SSL tantrums or simply time out. It’s the digital equivalent of a building with no front door and a 'Keep Out' sign written in crayon.
Technically unreachable
SEO
5
I searched for 'onstudio.altervista.org' and Google returned zero results. You haven't built a website; you've built a witness protection program. Your SEO strategy is apparently 'Hope nobody finds us.'
Zero search presence
Copywriting
20
By choosing a name like 'OnStudio'—which is shared by approximately 4,000 other agencies with actual budgets—and burying it on a free Italian host, you've ensured that anyone looking for you will find a 3D rendering firm in Portugal or a recording studio in Oregon instead.
Brand identity crisis
Trust
20
The lack of an SSL-secured custom domain and the 'www' prefix on a subdomain that doesn't support it makes this look less like a professional firm and more like a high school student's 'Intro to HTML' project from 2008.
Missing professional signals