The design feels like a standard template from 2018, complete with an 'Accessibility' widget in the footer proudly proclaiming 'Provided by: sogo logo', which is the digital equivalent of putting a sticker on your Ferrari that says 'Engine by Craigslist.' The choice of 'The Execution of Lady Jane Grey' as a header image in the Google snippet is bold, if slightly off-brand for sci-fi, but at least there's an explanation for it, somewhere.

Generic, dated design

While the site likely loads fast due to its apparent simplicity and lack of heavy frameworks – a win by default rather than design – it's certainly not pushing any envelopes. It’s like a bicycle in a drag race; it'll get there eventually, but nobody's going to be impressed by the lack of horsepower under the hood.

Lack of innovation

Your meta title, 'The Correction - Science Fiction Novel', is clear, but the main H1 stating 'What is The Correction?' immediately followed by 'The Correction' feels like asking a question only to answer it with a shrug. And let's talk about the copyright: Google thinks it's © 2025, but your actual footer claims © 2026 Sarit Zadok. Pick a year, any year, just commit to it.

Redundant H1, inconsistent copyright

The raw, unvarnished story of 'I queried about 100 agents—to no avail. Maybe another 20 publishers...' is certainly honest, but perhaps a bit too much for a sales page, even if you frame it as a 'blessing'. And the multiple calls to action – 'BUY The Correction,' 'Access The Correction,' then a 'Donate' button – makes it feel less like a novel launch and more like a Kickstarter campaign for a book that's already written.

Over-sharing, aggressive CTAs

The 'Provided by: sogo logo' for your accessibility widget screams 'free plugin' more than 'professional author website.' And while I admire the hustle, adding a 'Donate' button right next to buying options for a self-published novel, before I've even read a sample, is a bold move. It’s like asking for gas money before the test drive.

Amateur trust signals